Legislative Bargaining (over discrete bills)
نویسنده
چکیده
We provide a theory of legislative bargaining in a setting where the institution-free model of social choice theory yields no equilibrium. We model negotiations over a set of discrete bills (i.e. bills that can only be approved or dismissed) as a repeated game where a status quo is amended until an agreement is reached. Our goal is to understand when logrolling or vote trading agreements occur. In a stylised setting with three voters and two bills, we nd that negotiations may lead to three outcomes: (1) the majoritarian one; (2) the logrolling one where two players vote against their position on their least preferred bill in order to gain support for their most preferred bill; and (3) one where the most a¤ected voter by the logrolling outcome, in order to avoid such outcome, agrees to implement the wills of another voter. JEL Classi cation: C72, C78, D72
منابع مشابه
Omnibus or not: package bills and single-issue bills in a legislative bargaining game
Legislators sometimes pass unrelated issues in one bill with one vote (omnibus bills), but they often vote separately on different issues as well. In this paper, I consider a model in which the first mover chooses whether to bargain over an omnibus bill or several separate bills. The main difference between the two types of bills is that trade-offs between issues are possible with omnibus bills...
متن کاملThe legislative response to PTSD in the United States (1989-2009): a content analysis.
Although knowledge about posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has grown over the past 40 years, PTSD policy research is undeveloped. This gap in knowledge warrants attention because policy is among the most powerful tools to prevent and mitigate the effects of PTSD. This study provides a content analysis of all bills introduced in U.S. Congress that explicitly mentioned PTSD. All bills and bill...
متن کاملNber Working Paper Series Legislative Representation, Bargaining Power, and the Distribution of Federal Funds: Evidence from the U.s. Senate
While representation in the U.S. House is based upon state population, each state has an equal number (two) of U.S. Senators. Thus, relative to the state delegations in the U.S. House, small population states are provided disproportionate bargaining power in the U.S. Senate. This paper provides new evidence on the role of this small state bargaining power in the distribution of federal funds us...
متن کاملBill Sponsorship in Congress: The Moderating Effect of Agenda Positions on Legislative Proposals
Positions of influence over the legislative agenda provide greater opportunities for shaping policy outcomes. Do legislators take advantage of this? If they do, when the median is pivotal and legislators’ goals reflect both position taking and policy seeking, greater influence over the agenda leads legislators to moderate their bills relative to legislators with lower agenda priority. Analysis ...
متن کاملAnalysis of state obesity legislation from 2001 to 2010.
OBJECTIVE The prevalence of obesity has increased significantly since the 1950s. Currently, more than one-third of adults are obese. This study includes the review of 611 bills that were introduced over the past 10 years for the purpose of reducing obesity. DESIGN Bills were obtained from state legislature Web sites and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC's) Division of Nutritio...
متن کامل